SINGAPORE – The Workers’ Party’s proposal for a universal minimum wage could leave workers and businesses worse off, with the exercise to determine the wage level devolving into a political auction, said NTUC deputy secretary-general Koh Poh Koon on Thursday (Oct 15).











He added that the Government’s policies, particularly the Progressive Wage Model (PWM) that is mandatory for the cleaning, security and landscape sectors, already ensure that the vast majority of low-wage workers here bring home more than $1,300 a month, with data over the years indicating that it has also lifted the wages of such workers in other sectors.

His remarks in Parliament, during the debate on the Government’s strategy to emerge stronger from the Covid-19 pandemic, come amid growing discussion on the minimum wage, with the WP calling for a universal minimum wage of $1,300 to be introduced across all sectors.











Dr Koh’s remarks drew rebuttals from WP chief and Leader of the Opposition Pritam Singh and MPs Leon Perera (Aljunied GRC) and Jamus Lim (Sengkang GRC), with People’s Action Party MPs Edward Chia (Holland-Bukit Timah GRC) and Carrie Tan (Nee Soon GRC) also joining the debate.

A universal minimum wage had been a key proposal in the WP’s election manifesto for the July 10 General Election.

Wage setting as “political contest”











Addressing the WP’s proposal, Dr Koh, who is also Senior Minister of State for Health, said that while a single minimum wage is “seemingly a quick way to raise the wages of workers”, such a policy will also have drawbacks, as all policies do.

First is the danger of inadvertently putting workers at a disadvantage if the wage does not reflect the realities of each sector and is not sustainable or leads to unintended costs.











He said setting a wage level that is right for, say, cleaners and clerical staff alike, will be difficult, as each sector will have a different profile of low-wage workers and different concerns.

Meanwhile, an arbitrarily prescribed wage level is likely to end up being either not high enough to benefit all workers, or so high that companies in some sectors pass the costs back to consumers, cut back on hiring or go under, he added.

With no suitable basis by which to determine the wage, another danger is the inevitable politicisation of the exercise, he said.











Mr Singh had said in a Facebook post on Monday that a universal minimum wage is a “moral imperative” and an “act of national solidarity”.

Referring to this, Dr Koh said: “In a political contest, a political party will surely come along and say, well, $1,500 will reflect higher ‘moral imperatives’. Yet another will come along and say $1,300 is good, $1,500 is better, but $1,700 must surely be more divine, more imperative. It can become a political auction.”











He warned of such a process gaining momentum and becoming detached from market realities, saying that the minimum wage would escalate beyond what companies can afford and imperil the jobs of low-wage workers, as has played out in other countries.

In response, Mr Singh and Associate Professor Lim said that it would be possible to avoid this if the minimum wage is set by an independent panel and is also based on statistics such as an average household’s expenditure on basic necessities.

Another complication is whether a minimum wage introduced here should cover migrant workers such as foreign domestic workers, Dr Koh said, noting that there is an online petition “in honour of Mr Singh’s name” calling for this.











“If a minimum wage is driven simply by a ‘moral imperative’, then the natural question to ask is whether it should include non-Singaporeans such as migrant workers, including our foreign domestic workers,” added Dr Koh.

“Now, if businesses cannot bear the resulting costs, is that also a moral imperative to help our SMEs? This is a popular pertinent consideration at this time, when we are in a deep Covid-19 crisis. Many companies especially our SMEs, such as those in the construction sector, are suffering and not quite out of the woods.”











Dr Koh suggested that introducing a minimum wage now was inconsistent with what WP MPs have been saying about helping SMEs amid the recession, and would be akin to adding “more frost to the snow in companies that are in deep winter right now”.

He said: “So, I am not so much concerned by what Mr Singh and the WP is proposing for now, but by what it portends for the future – the possibility of a political auction that will price out lower-skilled workers, our brothers and sisters, and disadvantage our smaller enterprises, our smaller SMEs.”











While more can and should be done to help the lowest paid in Singapore, he added, “the cure should not be worse than the problem it tries to solve”.

Progressive Wage Model has worked
Stating that the Government is not ideologically against having a minimum wage, Dr Koh said the PWM was effectively a minimum wage tied to a skills ladder, and takes a different approach to uplifting the incomes of low-wage workers.











He noted that under the PWM, the Government can work with each industry to address its specific concerns and challenges, so as to arrive at a consensus and basis that the different stakeholders can support.

With so many parties involved, it is much less likely for political auctioning to happen, he added.

Addressing the criticism that the PWM covers only the cleaning, security and landscape sectors and not all low-wage workers, Dr Koh said the Government has committed to working with its tripartite partners to extend the PWM to all sectors. He added that the PWM has also helped lift wages in other sectors.











By biraj99

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *